Aquamation vs Cremation - All you need to know
Aquamation is an increasingly popular funeral process, not least for its promise of environmental friendliness.
In this article, we discuss the particularities of aquamation, its advantages and limitations, as well as the reasons why cremation, a service offered by Forêt de la seconde vie , remains a more widely appreciated alternative.
What is aquamation?
Aquamation, also known as alkaline hydrolysis, is the process of decomposing the body in a solution of water and alkaline products, such as potassium, at elevated temperature.
This method is sometimes perceived as an environmentally-friendly option, but many experts question its real impact on the environment. Although it can reduce certain types of emissions, aquamation requires a sophisticated infrastructure and large quantities of water and energy, all of which limit access and adoption.
Comparing aquamation and cremation
1. Environmental impact
Aquamation is often promoted as an eco-responsible method, but the use of chemicals and the volume of water required raise concerns.
Cremation, on the other hand, emits CO₂ during the process, but is a far more accessible and optimized method of limiting environmental impacts. What's more, at Forêt de la seconde vie efforts are made to offset this footprint by integrating eco-responsible practices, such as tree planting.
2. Availability and accessibility
In Quebec, very few establishments offer aquamation, due to the high costs and infrastructure required.
Cremation remains by far the most accessible and accepted option for the majority of Quebecers. It is integrated into the services of Forêt de la seconde vie, offering a simple and respectful process for families.
3. Cost of services
Aquamation, which is still not very common, is generally more expensive due to the specific equipment required.
Cremation, on the other hand, benefits from well-established infrastructures and practices, making it more affordable while offering customization options to suit families' preferences and budgets.
When it comes to ecological sustainability, aquamation and cremation are often compared, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Aquamation consumes less energy than cremation and does not involve combustion, but it does require large quantities of water and the use of certain chemicals, some of which are recycled in the process.
Cremation, on the other hand, uses no water, but generates CO₂ emissions. Ultimately, both options have a relatively similar ecological impact, and the choice between them generally depends on personal values and local practices.
Why choose cremation with Forêt de la seconde vie?
For those seeking a respectful and affordable alternative, cremation represents a safe and accessible solution.
By opting for our cremation service, families benefit from complete support, with every step taken care of by our experienced team.
What's more, we offer natural, eco-friendly options to minimize environmental impact and celebrate the memory of the deceased with dignity.
We know that aquamation may seem attractive, but cremation continues to offer flexibility and accessibility better suited to the needs of Quebec families.
If you would like to learn more about our cremation services or receive personalized guidance, please visit our page dedicated to cremation with Forêt de la seconde vie.
